Overview
An open-ended hourly rate is one of the easiest ways for a party wall matter to become unnecessarily expensive.
That does not mean every hourly rate is improper. It means owners should be very cautious about appointing a surveyor without a clear estimate, cap or defined scope.
Why hourly billing creates risk
Hourly billing can reward time rather than outcome. In party wall matters, that can encourage: - long correspondence; - unnecessary site visits; - excessive drafting; - avoidable engineer input; - arguments over minor issues; - delay that increases the final bill.
The client may not know the likely cost until it is too late.
Better fee structures
Where possible, ask for: - a fixed fee; - a capped fee; - menu pricing for defined tasks; - a staged fee based on actual progress; - clear written approval before extra work is charged.
This gives everyone a better understanding of cost from the outset.
Why this matters for building owners
Building owners usually expect to pay reasonable fees. However, if the adjoining owner's surveyor is appointed on an open-ended basis, the building owner may face an inflated invoice at the end of the process.
That invoice can still be challenged, but the dispute itself creates more time and cost.
Why this matters for adjoining owners
Adjoining owners may think hourly billing is harmless because the building owner normally pays. That is risky. If the fee is reduced or not awarded in full, the adjoining owner may be left in an awkward position with their own surveyor.
What to ask before appointing
Before appointing a surveyor, ask: - what is the likely total fee? - what is included? - what is excluded? - what could increase the fee? - will you tell me before extra cost is incurred? - can the fee be fixed or capped?